Abstract:Mainstream neoclassical theory of growth excludes the dual economy development widely existing in developing countries from its analytical framework. That not only tends to obliterate the contribution of Lewisian development theory but also weakens its own explanatory power on a large number of development phenomena. This paper tries to fill the gap between the growth theory and the real world. Through reviewing literature of growth theories and sewing up empirical findings of economic history, the paper demonstrates that most nations of the economic history have been or are experiencing an accumulation of mass surplus labor in agriculture and therefore forming a dual economy, a process that can be called “Geertz Involution”. In this way, typical economic development of nations, eastern and western, can be stylized as undergoing five types and stages-namely, Malthus poverty trap, Geertz involution, Lewis dual economy development, Lewis turning point, and Solow neoclassical growth. Such a classification of types or stages of economic development can be more complete in theoretical logic and more inclusive in empirical evidence.
Key Words:Dual Economy Development; Economic Growth; Geertz Involution
JEL Classification:O10, O57, N10 |