工作论文
当前位置:首页 > 工作论文
财政支出的部门配置
阅读全文         下载全文
TitleIntersectoral Allocation of Public Expenditure  
作者齐鹰飞 Li Yuanfei  
AuthorQi Yingfei and Li Yuanfei  
作者单位东北财经大学经济学院 
OrganizationDongbei University of Finance and Economics 
作者Emailqiyingfei@dufe.edu.cn;vvputin@126.com。 
中文关键词财政政策 财政支出乘数 生产网络 产业结构升级 
Key WordsFiscal Policy; Fiscal Multiplier; Production Network; Industrial Structure Upgrading  
内容提要通过将生产网络引入一个多部门一般均衡模型,本文分析了财政支出的部门配置对GDP、福利和产业结构的影响。在较为一般的假设条件下,本文证明GDP(从而财政支出乘数)以及家庭福利与财政支出的部门配置无关,但产业结构受财政支出部门配置的影响。该发现意味着中国的“稳增长”和“调结构”可望同时实现。基于对部门财政支出结构效应的分解,本文利用中国投入产出表数据分析了财政支出部门配置的边际调整对产业结构升级的影响,发现将财政支出从“高污染、高耗能”的限制产业向高新技术产业调整1元最多可使高新技术产业增加值与限制产业相比提高0.8967元。 
AbstractChina’s public expenditure accounts for more than 20% of GDP every year since 2000 (Chang et al., 2016). But such a large amount of public expenditure is ultimately allocated in various sectors of the economy. For example, infrastructure investment often refers to government purchases of output in sectors such as construction. What is the impact on economy if these money turns to education or other sectors? To understand how fiscal policy affects economy, a number of related questions are worth pondering: does the fiscal multiplier stay the same? Are residents’ welfare affected? And how does the industrial structure change? Considering and answering the above questions is of special significance to the current Chinese economy. Fiscal policy has always been at the heart of the Chinese government’s policy toolkit. Over the years, the central economic work conference communiqué is focus on the next fiscal policy focus point. For example, the central economic work conference held at the end of 2017 proposed to “adjust and optimize the structure of public expenditure”. It is not hard to find that optimizing the allocation of public expenditure and improving the efficiency of fiscal policy are the core policy issues concerned by the Chinese government in recent years. In order to cope with the current complex and volatile international economic situation and to achieve high-quality development and successfully overcome the “middle-income trap”, undoubtedly the fiscal policy will be more “proactive”. Especially in the context of the implementation of structural tax reduction, how to optimize the allocation of public expenditure is particularly important. Therefore, we build a multi-sector general equilibrium model to analyze the total allocation and structural effects of public expenditure, so as to try to give preliminary answers to the questions mentioned in the first paragraph. In order to clarify whether the allocation of public expenditure in different sectors may have different influences, it is necessary to clearly depict the economic correlation among these sectors. Therefore, we introduce the recent research on production network (Acemoglu et al., 2012; Acemoglu et al., 2016; Acemoglu et al., 2017; Baqaee & Farhi, 2019; Liu, 2019) into the analysis of financial policies. In a sense, this paper can be regarded as a preliminary attempt to introduce production network into financial policy analysis. Under the general assumption, we prove that the allocation of financial expenditure among different sectors does not have the total effect, but only has the structural effect. To be specific, allocation of public expenditure does not change GDP, Fiscal Multiplier as well as consumer welfare. Only the industrial structure is affected by such allocation. One policy implication of this paper is that the goal of “steady growth” and “structural adjustment” can be achieved at the same time. Then consider the total industry allocation from the perspective of “restructuring”. Given that the unreasonable allocation of public expenditure may be one of the reasons for the distortion of China’s industrial structure it is no doubt to release a new development dividend if the allocation can be adjusted to achieve the optimization of industrial structure without affecting its driving effect on GDP. The policy experiment in this paper shows that, in order to optimize the industrial structure, the public expenditure is transferred from the restricted industries with “high pollution and high energy consumption” to the high-tech industries. The adjustment of public expenditure by 1RMB can increase the added value of high-tech industries relative to restricted industries by 0.8967RMB. Compared with the existing research, the possible marginal contribution of this paper is as follows: firstly, it provides a simple reference for the multiplier effect of departmental public expenditure. The neutral proposition proposed in this paper gives the condition that the multiplier effect of public expenditure is ignored when the multiplier effect of public expenditure is studied in the case of inter-departmental input-output correlation, and thus complements the existing researches on Fiscal Multiplier. Secondly, it provides new thinking for studying the role of fiscal policy in the upgrading of industrial structure. This paper decomposes the structural effect of department public expenditure: the total effect is separated and the influence of the adjustment of its department allocation on the industrial structure is investigated separately. In this sense we provide theoretical basis for how to implement “steady growth” and “structural adjustment” in China.  
文章编号WP1467 
登载时间2020-02-26 
  • 主管单位:中国社会科学院     主办单位:中国社会科学院经济研究所
  • 经济研究杂志社版权所有 未经允许 不得转载     京ICP备10211437号
  • 本网所登载文章仅代表作者观点 不代表本网观点或意见 常年法律顾问:陆康(重光律师事务所)
  • 国际标准刊号 ISSN 0577-9154      国内统一刊号 CN11-1081/F       国内邮发代号 2-251        国外代号 M16
  • 地址:北京市西城区阜外月坛北小街2号   100836
  • 电话/传真:010-68034153
  • 本刊微信公众号:erj_weixin